https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312399 Where the accused questions the trial court's territorial or other jurisdiction after summons, the proper course is to raise that objection first before the trial court by an application setting out the relevant facts. The trial court should hear both sides and, if necessary, record evidence before deciding the jurisdictional issue and proceeding further. Direct recourse to the higher court against the summoning order is not the appropriate first step when the objection turns on factual matters. The jurisdictional challenge must therefore be determined on merits by the trial court before the case continues. en-us Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:34:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312399 Where the accused questions the trial court's territorial or other jurisdiction after summons, the proper course is to raise that objection first before the trial court by an application setting out the relevant facts. The trial court should hear both sides and, if necessary, record evidence before deciding the jurisdictional issue and proceeding further. Direct recourse to the higher court against the summoning order is not the appropriate first step when the objection turns on factual matters. The jurisdictional challenge must therefore be determined on merits by the trial court before the case continues. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312399