<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Assessment Reopening Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 148A Procedures; Case Remanded for Proper Notice Issuance.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74932</link>
    <description>Validity of reopening of assessment - grievance raised that the objections raised were not specifically dealt - Procedure prescribed u/s 148A followed or not? - The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) after the decision of Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal issued guidelines for issuance of notice u/s 148 - The High court found that the impugned order did not adhere to the prescribed procedures u/s 148A of the Act and the CBDT guidelines. The order was quashed, and the matter was remitted back to the respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the law. - Consequently, the HC remanded the matter back to proceed with notice u/s 148-A(b) in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:03:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:03:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Assessment Reopening Quashed for Non-Compliance with Section 148A Procedures; Case Remanded for Proper Notice Issuance.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74932</link>
      <description>Validity of reopening of assessment - grievance raised that the objections raised were not specifically dealt - Procedure prescribed u/s 148A followed or not? - The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) after the decision of Supreme Court in Ashish Agarwal issued guidelines for issuance of notice u/s 148 - The High court found that the impugned order did not adhere to the prescribed procedures u/s 148A of the Act and the CBDT guidelines. The order was quashed, and the matter was remitted back to the respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the law. - Consequently, the HC remanded the matter back to proceed with notice u/s 148-A(b) in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:03:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>