<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 760 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449609</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 129 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was held unsustainable where goods were supported by invoices, bilty documents and e-way bills, and the only defect was a wrong place of supply in four e-way bills. The Court treated the error as clerical, noting that the incorrect address was the petitioner&#039;s registered office, the remaining documents showed the correct destination, and the mistake appeared to arise from auto-population in the e-way bill system. As there was no material indicating an intention to evade tax, the Court distinguished cases involving absent, expired or wholly non-disclosing e-way bills and granted relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 760 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449609</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 129 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was held unsustainable where goods were supported by invoices, bilty documents and e-way bills, and the only defect was a wrong place of supply in four e-way bills. The Court treated the error as clerical, noting that the incorrect address was the petitioner&#039;s registered office, the remaining documents showed the correct destination, and the mistake appeared to arise from auto-population in the e-way bill system. As there was no material indicating an intention to evade tax, the Court distinguished cases involving absent, expired or wholly non-disclosing e-way bills and granted relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>