https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449600 The court set aside the assessment order finalized by the assessing authority, which incorrectly claimed that no objections were filed by the petitioner, a Non-Resident Indian, regarding the draft assessment order. The court found the assessing authority's requirement for filing objections with both the Dispute Resolution Panel and itself unreasonable. It emphasized that the Panel had already issued directions after considering the objections. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the assessing authority to issue a new assessment order in accordance with the Panel's directions. The writ petition was allowed, despite arguments that the order was appealable under Section 246A. en-us Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:31:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449600 The court set aside the assessment order finalized by the assessing authority, which incorrectly claimed that no objections were filed by the petitioner, a Non-Resident Indian, regarding the draft assessment order. The court found the assessing authority's requirement for filing objections with both the Dispute Resolution Panel and itself unreasonable. It emphasized that the Panel had already issued directions after considering the objections. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the assessing authority to issue a new assessment order in accordance with the Panel's directions. The writ petition was allowed, despite arguments that the order was appealable under Section 246A. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 22 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449600