<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 750 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449599</link>
    <description>Kerala HC held that addition u/s 68 for loans from 5 persons was invalid as petitioner was not given notice regarding these transactions. While creditworthiness of 17 lenders was satisfactory and 11 were unsatisfactory, the assessment order mentioned 28 persons but only 22 were in the notice. Court remanded matter to assessing authority for fresh assessment order, directing petitioner to file response regarding the 5 persons only. No opportunity granted for other creditors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:31:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 750 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449599</link>
      <description>Kerala HC held that addition u/s 68 for loans from 5 persons was invalid as petitioner was not given notice regarding these transactions. While creditworthiness of 17 lenders was satisfactory and 11 were unsatisfactory, the assessment order mentioned 28 persons but only 22 were in the notice. Court remanded matter to assessing authority for fresh assessment order, directing petitioner to file response regarding the 5 persons only. No opportunity granted for other creditors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>