<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 744 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449593</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the profit on the disputed purchases should be determined at 12.5%, reducing the addition from the 25% determined by the CIT(A). The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, while the appeals of the assessee were partly allowed, adjusting the addition on account of bogus purchases accordingly. The Tribunal&#039;s decision reflects a partial acceptance of the assessee&#039;s arguments regarding the assessment&#039;s legality and the extent of the additions made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 06:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 744 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449593</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the profit on the disputed purchases should be determined at 12.5%, reducing the addition from the 25% determined by the CIT(A). The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, while the appeals of the assessee were partly allowed, adjusting the addition on account of bogus purchases accordingly. The Tribunal&#039;s decision reflects a partial acceptance of the assessee&#039;s arguments regarding the assessment&#039;s legality and the extent of the additions made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>