https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449579 Parity with co-accused did not justify regular bail where the petitioner was treated as the principal accused and the material indicated a pivotal role in the alleged laundering activity. Prolonged custody and delay were also rejected as grounds for enlargement because the trial had only recently advanced, charge had been framed, few witnesses had been examined, and prima facie material linked the petitioner to the offence. The Court further held that the medical plea was insufficient, noting jail monitoring and referral to a higher medical centre. No fresh circumstance was found to warrant regular bail, and the trial court was directed to expedite the proceedings. en-us Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:30:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449579 Parity with co-accused did not justify regular bail where the petitioner was treated as the principal accused and the material indicated a pivotal role in the alleged laundering activity. Prolonged custody and delay were also rejected as grounds for enlargement because the trial had only recently advanced, charge had been framed, few witnesses had been examined, and prima facie material linked the petitioner to the offence. The Court further held that the medical plea was insufficient, noting jail monitoring and referral to a higher medical centre. No fresh circumstance was found to warrant regular bail, and the trial court was directed to expedite the proceedings. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449579