https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449577 The Tribunal set aside the order dismissing the appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Initially, the appellant's failure to make the necessary pre-deposit led to the dismissal of their appeal. However, after the appellant completed the required 10% pre-deposit, the Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh adjudication. This decision allows the appellant to present all relevant evidence and arguments, ensuring the case is reviewed thoroughly on its merits. en-us Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:30:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449577 The Tribunal set aside the order dismissing the appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Initially, the appellant's failure to make the necessary pre-deposit led to the dismissal of their appeal. However, after the appellant completed the required 10% pre-deposit, the Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh adjudication. This decision allows the appellant to present all relevant evidence and arguments, ensuring the case is reviewed thoroughly on its merits. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449577