<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 255 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312380</link>
    <description>Amounts due from successful auction bidders for toddy shops were recoverable as arrears of land revenue under section 28 of the Abkari Act, because the statutory scheme treated a bidder as a grantee of the privilege once the bid and consideration conditions were met. A formally executed contract under Article 299 of the Constitution was not a prerequisite to enforcement where the liability arose directly from the statute. Section 18A(2) supported this position by treating the bidder as a grantee even before receipt of the licence. The recovery proceedings were therefore valid despite the absence of an executed contract.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:31:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 255 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312380</link>
      <description>Amounts due from successful auction bidders for toddy shops were recoverable as arrears of land revenue under section 28 of the Abkari Act, because the statutory scheme treated a bidder as a grantee of the privilege once the bid and consideration conditions were met. A formally executed contract under Article 299 of the Constitution was not a prerequisite to enforcement where the liability arose directly from the statute. Section 18A(2) supported this position by treating the bidder as a grantee even before receipt of the licence. The recovery proceedings were therefore valid despite the absence of an executed contract.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>