<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 887 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312379</link>
    <description>Consideration for sale of software products to a distributor was analysed under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and the copyright definition in section 14(1)(a) of the Copyright Act. A licence allowing duplication or reproduction was treated as a transfer of copyright, whereas supply of software for onward resale without any right to copy was treated as a transfer of a copyrighted article. On the agreement&#039;s terms, the distributor received only software products for resale and no right to reproduce or exploit the software. The India-USA DTAA Article 12(3) was read as covering payment for use of, or right to use, copyright, not a copyrighted product. The amount was therefore not royalty and, if taxable at all, only as business profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 887 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312379</link>
      <description>Consideration for sale of software products to a distributor was analysed under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and the copyright definition in section 14(1)(a) of the Copyright Act. A licence allowing duplication or reproduction was treated as a transfer of copyright, whereas supply of software for onward resale without any right to copy was treated as a transfer of a copyrighted article. On the agreement&#039;s terms, the distributor received only software products for resale and no right to reproduce or exploit the software. The India-USA DTAA Article 12(3) was read as covering payment for use of, or right to use, copyright, not a copyrighted product. The amount was therefore not royalty and, if taxable at all, only as business profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>