<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 706 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449555</link>
    <description>A special leave petition in an income tax matter was filed with a 250-day delay, and the delay was condoned. The Supreme Court then stated that, having regard to the facts of the case, it was not inclined to interfere and accordingly dismissed the petition. Any pending application was also disposed of. The operative points are the condonation of delay and the refusal to interfere on the facts presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 706 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449555</link>
      <description>A special leave petition in an income tax matter was filed with a 250-day delay, and the delay was condoned. The Supreme Court then stated that, having regard to the facts of the case, it was not inclined to interfere and accordingly dismissed the petition. Any pending application was also disposed of. The operative points are the condonation of delay and the refusal to interfere on the facts presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>