<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 683 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449532</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the previous order and remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for further consideration. The tribunal found that the valuation of the sludge/sediments at USD 420 per MT as lubricating oil was unsustainable due to a lack of conclusive evidence proving the substance was lubricating oil. The adjudicating authority is required to present concrete evidence to determine the correct nature and valuation of the substance found in the vessel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:14:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 683 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449532</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the previous order and remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for further consideration. The tribunal found that the valuation of the sludge/sediments at USD 420 per MT as lubricating oil was unsustainable due to a lack of conclusive evidence proving the substance was lubricating oil. The adjudicating authority is required to present concrete evidence to determine the correct nature and valuation of the substance found in the vessel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>