<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 72 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35813</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the utilization of funds did not breach the Income Tax Act. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the transfer of funds for dividends should be based on actual utilization and fund availability, not just transfers between accounts. The judgment highlighted the significance of factual analysis and proper application of legal provisions in assessing reserve usage for dividend distribution, ensuring adherence to the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:48:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 72 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35813</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the utilization of funds did not breach the Income Tax Act. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the transfer of funds for dividends should be based on actual utilization and fund availability, not just transfers between accounts. The judgment highlighted the significance of factual analysis and proper application of legal provisions in assessing reserve usage for dividend distribution, ensuring adherence to the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>