<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 678 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449527</link>
    <description>The insolvency framework permits courts to require procedural safeguards for the committee of creditors where the statutory scheme supports regulatory guidance, but it does not allow interference with the committee&#039;s commercial wisdom. The Delhi HC treated the request as limited to a code of conduct or guidelines for effective monitoring and functioning of creditors, and held that any such framework must respect fairness, reasonableness, proportionality, and natural justice. It recognised the regulator&#039;s power to specify mechanisms for regulatory functioning and accepted the request in principle, directing suitable guidelines to be framed or finalised within a reasonable time while preserving the primacy of commercial decision-making under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:14:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 678 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449527</link>
      <description>The insolvency framework permits courts to require procedural safeguards for the committee of creditors where the statutory scheme supports regulatory guidance, but it does not allow interference with the committee&#039;s commercial wisdom. The Delhi HC treated the request as limited to a code of conduct or guidelines for effective monitoring and functioning of creditors, and held that any such framework must respect fairness, reasonableness, proportionality, and natural justice. It recognised the regulator&#039;s power to specify mechanisms for regulatory functioning and accepted the request in principle, directing suitable guidelines to be framed or finalised within a reasonable time while preserving the primacy of commercial decision-making under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>