<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 672 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449521</link>
    <description>No ground was found to interfere with the impugned order, so the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and disposed of the pending application. The dismissal was based on the Court&#039;s view that interference was unwarranted on the record before it. The Court also expressly left the substantive question of law open for future consideration, so the dismissal did not decide that issue on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:13:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 672 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449521</link>
      <description>No ground was found to interfere with the impugned order, so the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and disposed of the pending application. The dismissal was based on the Court&#039;s view that interference was unwarranted on the record before it. The Court also expressly left the substantive question of law open for future consideration, so the dismissal did not decide that issue on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>