https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312365 An order declaring vacancy under the U.P. Urban Buildings Act was treated as a preliminary step in the chain leading to allotment or release, so it could be challenged together with the final order in revision; the prior writ order had preserved that liberty, and the High Court's contrary view was incorrect. On the merits, deemed vacancy under Section 12(1)(b) arises only when a non-family member is allowed to occupy the premises in an independent right, not where occupation is by the tenant's family or connected persons. The revisional court was entitled to correct the Rent Controller's misreading of evidence, and the High Court improperly reappreciated the record under Article 227. en-us Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:32:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312365 An order declaring vacancy under the U.P. Urban Buildings Act was treated as a preliminary step in the chain leading to allotment or release, so it could be challenged together with the final order in revision; the prior writ order had preserved that liberty, and the High Court's contrary view was incorrect. On the merits, deemed vacancy under Section 12(1)(b) arises only when a non-family member is allowed to occupy the premises in an independent right, not where occupation is by the tenant's family or connected persons. The revisional court was entitled to correct the Rent Controller's misreading of evidence, and the High Court improperly reappreciated the record under Article 227. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312365