https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312363 Supreme Court review in criminal matters is confined to an error apparent on the face of the record or a comparable manifest error causing miscarriage of justice; it is not a rehearing or an appeal in disguise. Applying that standard, the Court found no patent error in the affirmed conviction and death sentence, rejected attempts to reappreciate evidence, and held that objections to the tape-recorded conversation and to sentencing did not disclose any ground for review. The earlier judgment therefore remained undisturbed. en-us Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:32:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312363 Supreme Court review in criminal matters is confined to an error apparent on the face of the record or a comparable manifest error causing miscarriage of justice; it is not a rehearing or an appeal in disguise. Applying that standard, the Court found no patent error in the affirmed conviction and death sentence, rejected attempts to reappreciate evidence, and held that objections to the tape-recorded conversation and to sentencing did not disclose any ground for review. The earlier judgment therefore remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312363