https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312356 Revisional power under Rule 23 of the U.P. Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 is confined to testing the legality, propriety and regularity of the appellate order. It is narrower than appellate jurisdiction and does not permit a second re-hearing on facts or a fresh reappreciation of evidence. Interference with factual findings is justified only where the order suffers from illegality, impropriety, perversity, misreading or ignoring material evidence, or causes miscarriage of justice. A revisional authority that merely prefers another view on the same material exceeds jurisdiction; the appellate relief was therefore restored. en-us Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:32:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312356 Revisional power under Rule 23 of the U.P. Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 is confined to testing the legality, propriety and regularity of the appellate order. It is narrower than appellate jurisdiction and does not permit a second re-hearing on facts or a fresh reappreciation of evidence. Interference with factual findings is justified only where the order suffers from illegality, impropriety, perversity, misreading or ignoring material evidence, or causes miscarriage of justice. A revisional authority that merely prefers another view on the same material exceeds jurisdiction; the appellate relief was therefore restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312356