<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 555 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312351</link>
    <description>Under revisional jurisdiction in rent-control matters, the High Court cannot reappraise evidence or substitute its own factual view for the Rent Controller&#039;s finding on bona fide requirement unless the finding is legally erroneous or patently unreasonable. The landlord&#039;s eviction claim under the Delhi Rent Control Act was not defeated merely because she owned residential accommodation in another city; the relevant test is whether there is any other reasonably suitable residential accommodation in the same city or within reasonable proximity. On the facts noted, the landlord&#039;s need remained bona fide and the eviction order was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:29:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 555 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312351</link>
      <description>Under revisional jurisdiction in rent-control matters, the High Court cannot reappraise evidence or substitute its own factual view for the Rent Controller&#039;s finding on bona fide requirement unless the finding is legally erroneous or patently unreasonable. The landlord&#039;s eviction claim under the Delhi Rent Control Act was not defeated merely because she owned residential accommodation in another city; the relevant test is whether there is any other reasonably suitable residential accommodation in the same city or within reasonable proximity. On the facts noted, the landlord&#039;s need remained bona fide and the eviction order was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>