<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner&#039;s GST Concession Request to Be Evaluated Under 2018 Policy, Ignoring 2019 Amendments.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74881</link>
    <description>Declination to accept the recommendation made by the Chief Commissioner of Persons with Disabilities by his order dated 06.04.2023 - seeking direction to the respondents to grant GST Concession Certificate to the petitioner so that petitioner can avail concessional rate of GST - The petitioner&#039;s contention that their application should be considered under the 2018 policy, as it was submitted before the amendment to the policy in 2019. - The High Cdourt observed that there were no restrictions regarding the length of the vehicle or the date of purchase under the 2018 policy. - The court found that the petitioner&#039;s application should have been considered under the 2018 policy, and the subsequent amendment to the policy did not affect the validity of their application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:14:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:14:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner&#039;s GST Concession Request to Be Evaluated Under 2018 Policy, Ignoring 2019 Amendments.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74881</link>
      <description>Declination to accept the recommendation made by the Chief Commissioner of Persons with Disabilities by his order dated 06.04.2023 - seeking direction to the respondents to grant GST Concession Certificate to the petitioner so that petitioner can avail concessional rate of GST - The petitioner&#039;s contention that their application should be considered under the 2018 policy, as it was submitted before the amendment to the policy in 2019. - The High Cdourt observed that there were no restrictions regarding the length of the vehicle or the date of purchase under the 2018 policy. - The court found that the petitioner&#039;s application should have been considered under the 2018 policy, and the subsequent amendment to the policy did not affect the validity of their application.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:14:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>