<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1927 (2) TMI 19 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312349</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the court, affirming the validity of the lease of inam lands for temple service but recognizing it as voidable at the plaintiff&#039;s discretion. The plaintiff, having accepted rent and not repudiated the lease upon assuming office, was bound by its terms. The judgment reinforced the inalienability of temple service lands and upheld established legal principles, noting that illegal alienations do not convert inalienable property into alienable property, regardless of any alleged custom.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:08:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1927 (2) TMI 19 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312349</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the court, affirming the validity of the lease of inam lands for temple service but recognizing it as voidable at the plaintiff&#039;s discretion. The plaintiff, having accepted rent and not repudiated the lease upon assuming office, was bound by its terms. The judgment reinforced the inalienability of temple service lands and upheld established legal principles, noting that illegal alienations do not convert inalienable property into alienable property, regardless of any alleged custom.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>