<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 655 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449504</link>
    <description>Non-generation of Part B of the e-way bill was treated as a technical defect where the invoices disclosed the vehicle number, the goods were being moved between branches, and no material showed an intention to evade tax. On that factual basis, penalty under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act was found unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 655 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449504</link>
      <description>Non-generation of Part B of the e-way bill was treated as a technical defect where the invoices disclosed the vehicle number, the goods were being moved between branches, and no material showed an intention to evade tax. On that factual basis, penalty under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act was found unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>