<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 636 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449485</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi ruled that service tax/GST, being statutory levies, should not be included in gross receipts for computing presumptive income under Section 44BB. The Tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions made by AO, relying on precedents from Delhi HC in Mitchell Drilling International and Uttarakhand HC in Schlumberger Asia Services. The issue was settled in favor of assessee, with service tax receipts excluded from Section 44BB computation. Decision went against revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 636 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449485</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi ruled that service tax/GST, being statutory levies, should not be included in gross receipts for computing presumptive income under Section 44BB. The Tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions made by AO, relying on precedents from Delhi HC in Mitchell Drilling International and Uttarakhand HC in Schlumberger Asia Services. The issue was settled in favor of assessee, with service tax receipts excluded from Section 44BB computation. Decision went against revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>