<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 611 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449460</link>
    <description>A single complaint was maintainable for dishonour of multiple cheques issued in the same transaction when they were covered by a common statutory notice. The court held that prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act is not invalid merely because several cheques are involved, so long as the dishonour arises from the same transaction and the notice is consolidated. Since liability under Section 138 follows failure to pay after notice, separate complaints were not necessary. The order dismissing the complaint was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 611 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449460</link>
      <description>A single complaint was maintainable for dishonour of multiple cheques issued in the same transaction when they were covered by a common statutory notice. The court held that prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act is not invalid merely because several cheques are involved, so long as the dishonour arises from the same transaction and the notice is consolidated. Since liability under Section 138 follows failure to pay after notice, separate complaints were not necessary. The order dismissing the complaint was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>