https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312342 Rule 26 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016 requires a defective appeal to be re-filed within the prescribed time, and delay in re-filing is not condoned automatically. The applicant must explain the entire period of default with a reasonable and justifiable cause. Here, repeated re-filings left the same defects unrectified, including defects in the cause title, and the explanation did not satisfactorily account for the prolonged delay. The Tribunal therefore declined to condone the delay in re-filing and dismissed the condonation application. en-us Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312342 Rule 26 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016 requires a defective appeal to be re-filed within the prescribed time, and delay in re-filing is not condoned automatically. The applicant must explain the entire period of default with a reasonable and justifiable cause. Here, repeated re-filings left the same defects unrectified, including defects in the cause title, and the explanation did not satisfactorily account for the prolonged delay. The Tribunal therefore declined to condone the delay in re-filing and dismissed the condonation application. Case-Laws Law of Competition Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312342