https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312339 The court addressed central excise appeals, primarily focusing on delays in filing. The appellant's counsel must list similar appeals with delay details, allowing respondents to file objections. An application to modify a Supreme Court judgment was accepted for record. The court rejected a request to adjourn delay condonation hearings pending Supreme Court consideration. Application No.7610/2021 was disposed of according to the judgment. Central Excise Appeal No.10/2020 was designated as the leading case, highlighting its importance among the appeals. en-us Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Feb 2024 19:49:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312339 The court addressed central excise appeals, primarily focusing on delays in filing. The appellant's counsel must list similar appeals with delay details, allowing respondents to file objections. An application to modify a Supreme Court judgment was accepted for record. The court rejected a request to adjourn delay condonation hearings pending Supreme Court consideration. Application No.7610/2021 was disposed of according to the judgment. Central Excise Appeal No.10/2020 was designated as the leading case, highlighting its importance among the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312339