<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1401 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reference to the DVO without rejecting the books of accounts was invalid, rendering additions based on such a valuation report unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleted the additions related to unexplained cost of construction. Other grounds, including the validity of the notice issued u/s 148 and disallowance of interest on the loan, were dismissed as not pressed. The appeal regarding credit for sale proceeds of salvaged materials was not separately adjudicated as the main issue was resolved in favor of the assessee. The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:29:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1401 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reference to the DVO without rejecting the books of accounts was invalid, rendering additions based on such a valuation report unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleted the additions related to unexplained cost of construction. Other grounds, including the validity of the notice issued u/s 148 and disallowance of interest on the loan, were dismissed as not pressed. The appeal regarding credit for sale proceeds of salvaged materials was not separately adjudicated as the main issue was resolved in favor of the assessee. The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>