<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 610 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449459</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court disposed of the Special Leave Petition because the tax effect in the disputed income-tax matter fell below the monetary threshold prescribed for filing appeals and SLPs. The Court accepted the respondent&#039;s computation of the quantum and tax effect, and relied on the CBDT Circular dated 8 August 2019 fixing the threshold at Rs. 2 crore. The substantive questions of law were expressly left open for future consideration, so no merits-based ruling was given.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 610 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449459</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court disposed of the Special Leave Petition because the tax effect in the disputed income-tax matter fell below the monetary threshold prescribed for filing appeals and SLPs. The Court accepted the respondent&#039;s computation of the quantum and tax effect, and relied on the CBDT Circular dated 8 August 2019 fixing the threshold at Rs. 2 crore. The substantive questions of law were expressly left open for future consideration, so no merits-based ruling was given.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>