https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449443 Bombay HC disposed of a petition challenging a GST order, ruling that the petitioner had an alternative remedy available through appeal to the Principal Bench. The court noted that while a State Bench was notified at Goa, its members were not yet appointed. The HC held that the petitioner could approach the functioning Principal Bench for redress, with the option to transfer the appeal to the State Bench once members are appointed. The petition was disposed of with liberty to file an appeal before the appellate authority under Section 109 of the Central Act. en-us Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449443 Bombay HC disposed of a petition challenging a GST order, ruling that the petitioner had an alternative remedy available through appeal to the Principal Bench. The court noted that while a State Bench was notified at Goa, its members were not yet appointed. The HC held that the petitioner could approach the functioning Principal Bench for redress, with the option to transfer the appeal to the State Bench once members are appointed. The petition was disposed of with liberty to file an appeal before the appellate authority under Section 109 of the Central Act. Case-Laws GST Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449443