<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 66 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35789</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Income Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment under section 147 as there was no concrete evidence to support the belief that income had escaped assessment due to the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts. The notice issued under section 148 was deemed invalid and quashed, with no costs awarded to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:16:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 66 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35789</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Income Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment under section 147 as there was no concrete evidence to support the belief that income had escaped assessment due to the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts. The notice issued under section 148 was deemed invalid and quashed, with no costs awarded to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>