<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 587 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449436</link>
    <description>Delay in the special leave petitions was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to interfere after hearing the petitioner&#039;s counsel. The special leave petitions were therefore dismissed, and all pending applications were disposed of. The order does not record any substantive legal reasoning on the merits beyond the refusal to entertain the challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 587 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449436</link>
      <description>Delay in the special leave petitions was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to interfere after hearing the petitioner&#039;s counsel. The special leave petitions were therefore dismissed, and all pending applications were disposed of. The order does not record any substantive legal reasoning on the merits beyond the refusal to entertain the challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>