https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449407 Anticipatory bail was granted where the allegations were confined to introducing the complainant to a Chartered Accountant, attending the meeting, and allegedly receiving Rs. 30,000, because the material did not show conscious involvement in the alleged illegal design of the other accused. The Court held that custodial interrogation and pre-trial incarceration were not warranted on those facts, while imposing a condition of cooperation in recovery of the stated amount and permitting cancellation if that cooperation failed. The decision reflects that anticipatory bail may be allowed when the applicant's role does not establish knowing participation in the principal criminal plan and investigation can proceed without custody. en-us Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Feb 2024 06:28:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449407 Anticipatory bail was granted where the allegations were confined to introducing the complainant to a Chartered Accountant, attending the meeting, and allegedly receiving Rs. 30,000, because the material did not show conscious involvement in the alleged illegal design of the other accused. The Court held that custodial interrogation and pre-trial incarceration were not warranted on those facts, while imposing a condition of cooperation in recovery of the stated amount and permitting cancellation if that cooperation failed. The decision reflects that anticipatory bail may be allowed when the applicant's role does not establish knowing participation in the principal criminal plan and investigation can proceed without custody. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449407