https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312310 In Section 34 proceedings, an arbitral finding on service of arbitration notices was upheld because the notices were sent by registered post to correct addresses and service was supported by the statutory presumption under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897; the court declined to reappreciate evidence absent perversity or illegality, so the limitation objection failed. The challenge to pre-litigation interest also failed because no such interest had been awarded in the arbitral award. The contractual objection to costs succeeded only to a limited extent, and that part of the award was set aside. en-us Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 11 Feb 2024 14:55:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312310 In Section 34 proceedings, an arbitral finding on service of arbitration notices was upheld because the notices were sent by registered post to correct addresses and service was supported by the statutory presumption under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897; the court declined to reappreciate evidence absent perversity or illegality, so the limitation objection failed. The challenge to pre-litigation interest also failed because no such interest had been awarded in the arbitral award. The contractual objection to costs succeeded only to a limited extent, and that part of the award was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312310