<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1362 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312307</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay as the reasons provided by the appellant were deemed insufficient to justify the 43-day delay in filing the appeal under Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Consequently, the appeal against the order dated 23.02.2023, which sought to reject the report of the fourth respondent, was also dismissed due to improper constitution. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2024 14:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1362 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312307</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay as the reasons provided by the appellant were deemed insufficient to justify the 43-day delay in filing the appeal under Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Consequently, the appeal against the order dated 23.02.2023, which sought to reject the report of the fourth respondent, was also dismissed due to improper constitution. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>