https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312304 A company, as a juristic person, may substitute one authorised representative for another during criminal proceedings when the earlier representative no longer has a connection with it, and the accused cannot insist on continuity of the same individual. Evidence already recorded of the earlier representative cannot be expunged merely because of that substitution, since recorded testimony remains part of the trial record and must be assessed on its own worth. The High Court may still intervene under its inherent jurisdiction to correct a grave illegality or prevent abuse of process notwithstanding the bar on a second revision. en-us Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2024 17:14:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312304 A company, as a juristic person, may substitute one authorised representative for another during criminal proceedings when the earlier representative no longer has a connection with it, and the accused cannot insist on continuity of the same individual. Evidence already recorded of the earlier representative cannot be expunged merely because of that substitution, since recorded testimony remains part of the trial record and must be assessed on its own worth. The High Court may still intervene under its inherent jurisdiction to correct a grave illegality or prevent abuse of process notwithstanding the bar on a second revision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312304