<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (6) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35778</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the assessment of whether amounts received upon leaving a partnership firm were capital or revenue receipts. The court held that the sum received by the assessee upon retirement and the forgiven debt by the firm were not taxable income. It was determined that the amounts did not represent income but rather a return of capital or previously taxed profits. The court distinguished the case from prior precedents and awarded costs to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:53:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (6) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35778</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the assessment of whether amounts received upon leaving a partnership firm were capital or revenue receipts. The court held that the sum received by the assessee upon retirement and the forgiven debt by the firm were not taxable income. It was determined that the amounts did not represent income but rather a return of capital or previously taxed profits. The court distinguished the case from prior precedents and awarded costs to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>