<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 555 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449404</link>
    <description>Petitioner challenged a GST assessment order alleging breach of natural justice. HC found no personal hearing was provided despite show cause notice. Court quashed the original order, remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the assessing officer to provide personal hearing and allow petitioner to respond within ten days. The WP was allowed without costs, ensuring procedural fairness in the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 555 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449404</link>
      <description>Petitioner challenged a GST assessment order alleging breach of natural justice. HC found no personal hearing was provided despite show cause notice. Court quashed the original order, remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the assessing officer to provide personal hearing and allow petitioner to respond within ten days. The WP was allowed without costs, ensuring procedural fairness in the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>