<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 525 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449374</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting addition related to substantial increase in cash sales during demonetization period. CIT(A) had applied preponderance of probability in assessee&#039;s favor despite insufficient evidence of adequate stock availability. ITAT held that assessee failed to establish sufficient stock to support claimed sales transactions. Matter remitted to AO for fresh examination of stock details and proper determination of the issue. Revenue&#039;s appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 07:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 525 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449374</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting addition related to substantial increase in cash sales during demonetization period. CIT(A) had applied preponderance of probability in assessee&#039;s favor despite insufficient evidence of adequate stock availability. ITAT held that assessee failed to establish sufficient stock to support claimed sales transactions. Matter remitted to AO for fresh examination of stock details and proper determination of the issue. Revenue&#039;s appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>