<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 508 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449357</link>
    <description>NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s liquidation order based on CoC&#039;s unanimous decision. The tribunal rejected challenges alleging material irregularity and arbitrariness in the CoC&#039;s liquidation decision, emphasizing that CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom is supreme under IBC. The court found no grounds for judicial scrutiny under Section 30(2) or 61(3) of IBC, noting the CoC exercised clear commercial judgment after discussions with all stakeholders. Arguments regarding interim resolution professional&#039;s hesitation and Section 29-A(b) ineligibility were dismissed as irrelevant to the liquidation decision. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 508 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449357</link>
      <description>NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s liquidation order based on CoC&#039;s unanimous decision. The tribunal rejected challenges alleging material irregularity and arbitrariness in the CoC&#039;s liquidation decision, emphasizing that CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom is supreme under IBC. The court found no grounds for judicial scrutiny under Section 30(2) or 61(3) of IBC, noting the CoC exercised clear commercial judgment after discussions with all stakeholders. Arguments regarding interim resolution professional&#039;s hesitation and Section 29-A(b) ineligibility were dismissed as irrelevant to the liquidation decision. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>