https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449354 The HC dismissed the writ petition, upholding the service tax liabilities imposed on the petitioner for 'Advertising Agency Service' and 'Legal Consultancy Services' under the reverse charge mechanism for the periods 2012-17 and 2014-17, respectively. The petitioner failed to respond to multiple opportunities for personal hearings, leading to the imposition of tax, penalty, and interest. The court found no violation of natural justice principles, as the petitioner did not adequately engage with the proceedings, and deemed the orders well-reasoned, warranting no interference. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2024 07:43:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449354 The HC dismissed the writ petition, upholding the service tax liabilities imposed on the petitioner for 'Advertising Agency Service' and 'Legal Consultancy Services' under the reverse charge mechanism for the periods 2012-17 and 2014-17, respectively. The petitioner failed to respond to multiple opportunities for personal hearings, leading to the imposition of tax, penalty, and interest. The court found no violation of natural justice principles, as the petitioner did not adequately engage with the proceedings, and deemed the orders well-reasoned, warranting no interference. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449354