https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312289 A party cannot be allowed to approbate and reprobate by taking inconsistent stands before different fora. After the revenue authorities declined jurisdiction under Section 250 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 on the ground that title was in issue, the same defendants could not later contend that a civil suit was barred by Section 257. The Court held that accepting that objection would leave the plaintiff without any remedy, so the civil suit was not barred. The trial court was therefore right in refusing to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the order rejecting the plaint was unsustainable. en-us Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2024 05:45:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312289 A party cannot be allowed to approbate and reprobate by taking inconsistent stands before different fora. After the revenue authorities declined jurisdiction under Section 250 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 on the ground that title was in issue, the same defendants could not later contend that a civil suit was barred by Section 257. The Court held that accepting that objection would leave the plaintiff without any remedy, so the civil suit was not barred. The trial court was therefore right in refusing to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the order rejecting the plaint was unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312289