<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2145 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312286</link>
    <description>The HC permitted petitioner no.1 to engage in the resolution process by submitting a plan to respondent no.1. The court found respondent no.2&#039;s designation of petitioner no.2 and 3 as willful defaulters to be unjustified and aimed at disqualifying petitioner no.1 improperly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 05:45:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2145 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312286</link>
      <description>The HC permitted petitioner no.1 to engage in the resolution process by submitting a plan to respondent no.1. The court found respondent no.2&#039;s designation of petitioner no.2 and 3 as willful defaulters to be unjustified and aimed at disqualifying petitioner no.1 improperly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>