https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312284 Anticipatory bail was refused because the Court found no reason to extend pre-arrest protection on the record before it. It further stated that the power to grant regular bail includes the ancillary power to grant interim bail pending final disposal of the regular bail application, drawing support from Article 21 and the principle that a person should not be sent to jail where prima facie innocence is shown. Interim bail may therefore be sought with the regular bail application and decided on the same day, while the petitioner remained free to pursue appropriate bail relief before the competent court. en-us Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2024 18:31:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312284 Anticipatory bail was refused because the Court found no reason to extend pre-arrest protection on the record before it. It further stated that the power to grant regular bail includes the ancillary power to grant interim bail pending final disposal of the regular bail application, drawing support from Article 21 and the principle that a person should not be sent to jail where prima facie innocence is shown. Interim bail may therefore be sought with the regular bail application and decided on the same day, while the petitioner remained free to pursue appropriate bail relief before the competent court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312284