<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 2021 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312268</link>
    <description>Refund of excise duty on coal cleared at a notified price later reduced was not decided on merits because an identical dispute in the assessee&#039;s own case had already been remanded. Following that approach, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was sent back to the original authority for fresh adjudication, leaving the refund claim open for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 18:27:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 2021 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312268</link>
      <description>Refund of excise duty on coal cleared at a notified price later reduced was not decided on merits because an identical dispute in the assessee&#039;s own case had already been remanded. Following that approach, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was sent back to the original authority for fresh adjudication, leaving the refund claim open for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>