https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449337 Challenges to GST on royalty/seigniorage were not finally adjudicated because the determinative question-the nature of royalty-was already pending before a Nine Judge Constitution Bench. The court preserved the parties' rights, directed petitioners facing show cause notices to file objections, required adjudication to proceed in accordance with law, kept adjudication orders in abeyance until the Constitution Bench decision, and barred recovery of GST on royalty in the meantime. All contentions were left open for future proceedings after the authoritative ruling on royalty. en-us Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Apr 2025 12:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449337 Challenges to GST on royalty/seigniorage were not finally adjudicated because the determinative question-the nature of royalty-was already pending before a Nine Judge Constitution Bench. The court preserved the parties' rights, directed petitioners facing show cause notices to file objections, required adjudication to proceed in accordance with law, kept adjudication orders in abeyance until the Constitution Bench decision, and barred recovery of GST on royalty in the meantime. All contentions were left open for future proceedings after the authoritative ruling on royalty. Case-Laws GST Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449337