<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 484 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449333</link>
    <description>HC quashed the registration cancellation order due to procedural violations. The court found no electronic or physical notices were served after the initial registration cancellation, violating principles of natural justice. The petitioner was directed to receive a fresh notice, submit a reply within four weeks, and await a new order ensuring proper hearing within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 484 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449333</link>
      <description>HC quashed the registration cancellation order due to procedural violations. The court found no electronic or physical notices were served after the initial registration cancellation, violating principles of natural justice. The petitioner was directed to receive a fresh notice, submit a reply within four weeks, and await a new order ensuring proper hearing within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>