<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 480 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449329</link>
    <description>A GST challenge raised questions on the validity of the impugned notifications and the consequential show cause notice, including whether the further extension of time for issuing notice was unauthorised and time-barred. A further contention was that the later notification operated only under the Central GST framework without a corresponding State GST notification. The Court directed filing of counter affidavit and rejoinder, and allowed the proceedings to continue only to a limited extent, while restraining the passing of any final order without leave of the Court. No final determination was made on the notifications or the limitation objection, and the matter remained pending with interim protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 480 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449329</link>
      <description>A GST challenge raised questions on the validity of the impugned notifications and the consequential show cause notice, including whether the further extension of time for issuing notice was unauthorised and time-barred. A further contention was that the later notification operated only under the Central GST framework without a corresponding State GST notification. The Court directed filing of counter affidavit and rejoinder, and allowed the proceedings to continue only to a limited extent, while restraining the passing of any final order without leave of the Court. No final determination was made on the notifications or the limitation objection, and the matter remained pending with interim protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>