<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 477 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449326</link>
    <description>HC ruled that appeals were improperly rejected due to technical form errors in pre-deposit submission. The court remanded the matter back to the respondent to reconsider delay condoning petitions and appeals, directing expeditious processing. Appeals were reinstated, allowing petitioners to pursue their legal challenge without procedural barriers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 477 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449326</link>
      <description>HC ruled that appeals were improperly rejected due to technical form errors in pre-deposit submission. The court remanded the matter back to the respondent to reconsider delay condoning petitions and appeals, directing expeditious processing. Appeals were reinstated, allowing petitioners to pursue their legal challenge without procedural barriers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>