https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449321 Detention and seizure of goods under the CGST Act were not examined on merits; the High Court instead directed the authorities to consider the petitioners' representation seeking release of the seized vehicle and goods on payment of fine or penalty as may be permissible under Section 67(6) while adjudication under Section 130 continues. The representation dated 15 December 2023 was to be decided within two weeks. The detention order was not quashed and no finding was returned on the legality of the detention or on entitlement to release without payment. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449321 Detention and seizure of goods under the CGST Act were not examined on merits; the High Court instead directed the authorities to consider the petitioners' representation seeking release of the seized vehicle and goods on payment of fine or penalty as may be permissible under Section 67(6) while adjudication under Section 130 continues. The representation dated 15 December 2023 was to be decided within two weeks. The detention order was not quashed and no finding was returned on the legality of the detention or on entitlement to release without payment. Case-Laws GST Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449321