<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 447 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the imported goods due to non-compliance with import regulations but allowed the appellant to re-export the goods, considering the non-commercial intent for static display. The personal penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act was reduced to the amount already paid, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s bona fide intentions. The impugned order was modified, and the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 07:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 447 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the imported goods due to non-compliance with import regulations but allowed the appellant to re-export the goods, considering the non-commercial intent for static display. The personal penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act was reduced to the amount already paid, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s bona fide intentions. The impugned order was modified, and the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>